Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Article
Publication date: 7 September 2015

David H. Engvall, Reid S. Hooper, Keir D. Gumbs and David B.H. Martin

To outline and summarize the new disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed pay-for-performance rule, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall…

236

Abstract

Purpose

To outline and summarize the new disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed pay-for-performance rule, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Design/methodology/approach

This article highlights the proposed new disclosure requirements, while briefly discussing the technical requirements under the rule. The article concludes with a summary of the next steps in the rulemaking process followed by our observations of various issues raised by the proposed new disclosure requirement.

Findings

While the contours of any new disclosure requirements will depend on the specifics of the final rule, the pay-for-performance rule, as proposed, would represent a significant new annual disclosure obligation for many public companies.

Originality/value

Practical guidance from experienced securities and capital markets attorneys.

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 16 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 29 November 2011

David B.H. Martin and Keir D. Gumbs

The purpose of this paper is to consider the consequences of the July 22, 2011 decision of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in the case of Business Roundtable and

158

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to consider the consequences of the July 22, 2011 decision of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in the case of Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce v. Securities and Exchange Commission (BRT v. SEC) on current and future SEC rulemakings. The case involved the vacating of the SEC's shareholder proxy access rule.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper reviews the court's findings regarding the SEC's rulemaking procedures and analyzes how those findings will inform the SEC's future actions to adopt rules in the proxy access area, as well as future SEC rulemaking in other areas.

Findings

The paper finds that the SEC is unlikely, at this time, to undertake future rulemaking involving shareholder access to the proxy statement. At the same time, the SEC may well lift the stay that it voluntarily placed on related amendments to its shareholder proposal rule. These amendments would permit shareholder proposals to companies regarding access to the proxy statement.

Practical implications

Companies should consider how they will respond to shareholder proposals to adopt proxy access regimes. Shareholders should consider what kinds of proposals they may wish to submit to companies regarding proxy access.

Originality/value

This paper should be of interest to public companies, including investment companies, and shareholders of such companies, and their advisers, in terms of corporate governance mechanisms and engagement with shareholder concerns and inputs.

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 12 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

Keywords

1 – 2 of 2